What you will find on this blog:
ToggleWhy aligning the three levels of strategic planning is important
O planejamento estratégico consolidou-se como um dos pilares fundamentais da gestão empresarial contemporânea. Entretanto, em um ambiente marcado por volatilidade, incerteza e rápidas mudanças tecnológicas, as organizações que não estruturam adequadamente seus níveis estratégico, tático e operacional tendem a enfrentar falhas críticas na execução de suas estratégias. De acordo com a McKinsey & Company (2024), ,only 30% of strategic initiatives fully achieve their objectives, with the main cause being the disconnect between formulation and execution.
Da mesma forma, esse cenário é reforçado pela Harvard Business Review (2024), , which points out that about 60% of companies admit they are unable to translate their strategies into clear, measurable plans of action connected to daily operations. The consequence is a gap between corporate vision and delivered results, a phenomenon already described by Kaplan and Norton (1996) in the formulation of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), which continues to be one of the most relevant methodologies for aligning indicators, objectives, and actions.
The MIT Sloan Management Review (2025) highlights that companies that combine structured strategic planning with agile monitoring methodologies, such as OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) and cycles of PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act), are 40% more effective in adapting to market changes. This integration enables not only organizational resilience but also the building of a results-oriented culture.
However the challenges are persistent At the strategic level organizations often face excessive rigidity difficulty in prioritizing objectives and failures in communicating the strategy At the tactical level problems in goal cascading and misalignment between areas compromise execution At the operational level the main pain point is inconsistency in execution and lack of continuous monitoring These pains were also widely observed in recent studies by Business Strategy Hub (2024) , which reinforce the importance of connecting plans, indicators, and execution routines.
Corporate management tools have been gaining traction by offering strategic maps, indicator dashboards (KPIs), and integrated action plans, allowing companies to align strategy, tactics, and operations on a single platform. This practical approach helps overcome the challenges described while promoting greater visibility, engagement, and consistency in execution.
Thus understanding how to articulate strategic tactical and operational planning is not just a matter of managerial discipline but of organizational survival in an increasingly competitive market.
Visualize the key insights from the article clearly – Access the infographic
Overview: Strategic, operational, and tactical planning
- Strategic: defines direction, choices, and resource allocation; it should be simple, focused, and based on hypotheses about the future (e.g., scenarios). Harvard Business Review
- Tactical: translates choices into portfolios, OKRs, KPIs, and action plans with governance and installed capacity (people, budget, technology). McKinsey & Company
- Operational: ensures execution routines, PDCA, and problem solving, with cadences and visual standards close to the shop floor/service level. Lean Enterprise Institute
When these three levels are connected through objectives indicators and management rituals strategy becomes executable and adaptive The Balanced Scorecard remains a good backbone to integrate mission objectives and indicators as long as it is evolved for the current context. Harvard Business Review
How to Create a Strategic Plan | Vision, Choices, and Resources
Most frequent pains:
- Disconnection from reality and biases in looking to the future
- Lack of prioritization and extensive lists of initiatives
- Insufficient communication leading to different interpretations across areas
- Rigidity in the face of change
- Difficulty Measuring Results
How to solve them | step by step:
- Frame the future and choices: use foresight and scenarios to discuss alternatives (and why not adopt them). Explicitly present trade-offs and link to the purpose. Harvard Business Review
- Define a few strategic priorities (3–5) and target outcomes: a simple strategy is more executable. simple strategy is more executable. Harvard Business Review
- Align capital and people allocation with priorities: move resources dynamically, avoiding incrementalism. McKinsey & Company
- Choose metrics that matter: design KPIs that reflect the strategy (not just finances) and assess how AI can improve the relevance and frequency of measurements. Harvard Business Review/MIT Sloan Management Review
- Design the strategic map scorecard to make explicit the cause-and-effect relationships between objectives and indicators (e.g., finances, customers, processes, learning). Harvard Business Review
- Plan the communication cycle: explain discarded alternatives, link choices to long-term ambition, and involve leaders in co-creation. Harvard Business Review/MIT Sloan Management Review
- Equip the strategy with corporate OKRs (2–4 per priority) — qualitative objectives, key results quantitative, reviewed quarterly. McKinsey & Company/MIT Sloan Management Review
How to present a strategic plan
For the board and top leadership, you should go with a deck of 15–20 pages focusing on strategic thesis alternatives and trade offs priorities and resources critical risks and value metrics with baseline When communicating to the organization highlight why each choice matters the link to the purpose and how each area contributes. Harvard Business Review
Strategic management software helps to centralize the strategic map, scorecards, KPIs, action plans, and projects, as well as providing real-time visibility into execution, making it easier to steering monthly and reviews quarterly.
How to do tactical planning step by step | Deployment and governance
Most frequent pains:
- Poorly executed cascading vague objectives duplicated goals
- Misalignment between areas and priority conflicts
- Lack of resources for critical initiatives
- Excess of indicators more reporting than learning
- Ineffective vertical communication context does not reach the frontlines
How to solve them | Tactical Playbook:
- Cascade priorities into business OKRs by unit/segment, with key results of outcome (lagging) and capability/process (leading). In agile organizations, plan annual OKRs with quarterly check-ins. McKinsey & Company
- Build the portfoliolink each KR to initiatives projects with owner business case and milestones. Review the budget in a way quarterly. McKinsey & Company
- Select a few critical KPIs per area and avoid metric inflation Recent research recommends seeking a synthesis KPI that integrates objectives and reduces governance frictions. MIT Sloan Management Review
- Implement PDCA cadences: check-ins biweekly for action plans, monthly performance rituals, and quarterly business reviews for replanning. Lean Enterprise Institute
- Integrate risk into execution: connect strategic and operational risks to the portfolio, with mitigation plans, owners and controls.
- Standardize communication between areas: use narratives that explain why and how how each objective connects to the whole; limit priorities and reinforce decision criteria. MIT Sloan Management Review
Use some corporate management platform, preferably one that brings together connect risks, controls, and corrective actions in one place.
How to structure operational planning | Routine, PDCA, and culture
Most frequent pains:
- Inconsistent execution and lack of standard
- Lack of daily/weekly follow-up
- Cultural resistance
- Internal communication failures handoffs.
- Not measuring daily performance
How to solve them | Daily management system
- Bring KRs and KPIs down to the daily routine with weekly and daily goals team dashboards and checklists digital. Visual routines reduce variation and accelerate problem solving
- Standardize the PDCA with owner deadline and effectiveness validation short rituals (daily weekly) maintain focus and prioritize bottlenecks. Lean Enterprise Institute
- Ensure feedback loops between operations and tactical lessons from the floor must rise to quarterly replanning (e.g. adjust KRs cancel initiatives with low throughput). McKinsey & Company
- Take care of culture and communicationhigh performance execution depends on organizational health (alignment execution renewal) and clear communication edit messages and eliminate noise. McKinsey & Company
- Avoid over personalizing OKRs at the individual levelprioritize teams and squadsreinforcing collaboration and focus on collective results. MIT Sloan Management Review
Em razão disso, existem soluções de gestão corporativa que estruturam checklists inteligentes e ritos de acompanhamento para garantir disciplina operacional; apoiam o alcance de objetivos de equipe, promovendo feedbacks e desenvolvimento contínuo; e alinham incentivos às métricas críticas do negócio, reforçando os comportamentos desejados.
How to Connect Strategy, Tactics, and Operations: A Visual Guide for Leaders
How to do strategic planning step by step | A blueprint of 100 days
Days 0–30 | Strategy
- Context review and scenariosformulation of theses and choicesprioritization (3–5)
- Establish corporate OKRs and KPI set (include lead metrics) validate. Harvard Business Review/Lean Enterprise Institute
Days 31–60 | Tactical
- Cascading by units tribes design of portfolio platform business cases and resources
- Definition of governance (steering PDCA cadences evaluation criteria of kill/scale). McKinsey & Company/Lean Enterprise Institute
Days 61–100 | Operational
- Standardization of routines checklists and dashboardstraining of frontline leaders
- Pilots in critical areas with A3s for learning and quarterly adjustments
How to present a strategic plan | Communication script
- Key message on 1 pagestrategy on one page purpose choices key metrics risks
- Narrative of alternativeswhat was considered and why it was rejected
- Strategic map + BSCcause effect relationships and goals by perspective
- OKRs and portfoliohow KRs support priorities and which initiatives generate value
- Risks and mitigationtop 10 risks with plan owner and triggers
- Plan of reviews: cadências e critérios de replanejamento. Dê contexto, envolva pessoas no desenho e trate trade-offs de frente para consolidar buy-in. Harvard Business Review
Best practices to connect strategy tactics and operations
- Goal choices simplify prioritize and realign resources actively. Harvard Business Review/McKinsey & Company
- KPIs that reflect the strategy evolve metrics with AI support and avoid the accumulation of indicators. MIT Sloan Management Review
- OKRs as a bridgeannual at the corporate level with quarterly cycles for course correction focus on teams. MIT Sloan Management Review/McKinsey & Company
- disciplined PDCAconcise rituals verified corrective actions and learning loops documented. Lean Enterprise Institute
- Communication that engagesexplain choices priority limits and why each team matters to the whole. Harvard Business Review/MIT Sloan Management Review
- #1 Strategy Management Softwarecentralize maps scorecards KPIs OKRs risks projects and routines to give visibility and coherence from C level to the frontline. Harvard Business Review
Is your strategic planning ready for 2026?
Por isso, para uma estratégia robusta em 2026 fica claro que menos é sobre documentos extensos e mais sobre sistemas de escolhas, recursos e aprendizado contínuo. Ou seja, ao articular prioridades claras, vincular recursos a essas prioridades e operar com OKRs, KPIs e PDCA em cadências disciplinadas, suportado por uma plataforma de gestão, sua organização reduz o execution gap e acelera a criação de valor. De fato, as empresas que dominam essa orquestração, integram planejamento estratégico, tático e operacional num ciclo único, orientado a resultados e preparado para se adaptar rapidamente, como destaca McKinsey & Company.
Next steps
To adapt this blueprint to your reality schedule a demo by clicking here.






