The performance bonus program is one of the most powerful tools to align people with the company’s strategy. When well designed, it translates corporate goals into clear and fair incentives. But when it loses credibility, it stops engaging people and begins to erode the performance culture.
The good news is that this can be reversed. In fact, with a structured approach and transparency, it’s possible to rebuild trust in the variable compensation program and restore its effectiveness as a management tool.
Below are the five signs that your performance bonus program has lost credibility — and what you can do to fix each one.
Bonus – Performance Bonus Maturity Matrix: at the end of the article, access the maturity matrix and find out which stage of evolution your organization is in.
People don’t know how the performance bonus is calculated
This is the first and most obvious symptom. When employees can’t explain how the performance bonus amount is determined, something is wrong. The lack of clarity turns the program into a “black box” and creates distrust.
According to Aon’s 2025 Global Pay Transparency Study, companies that make their compensation criteria clear experience up to 30% higher employee trust.
How to fix it:
First of all, review how the program is communicated. Simplify the formulas, use numerical examples, and publish the criteria before the start of the cycle.
Transparency doesn’t reduce control — it increases engagement.
The performance bonus doesn’t reflect the company’s actual results
Turn your performance bonus program into a true results driver — get in touch!
Another classic symptom is when the performance bonus pays out — or fails to pay — amounts that don’t match reality.
When the company performs well but the performance bonus doesn’t reflect that success, the program loses its impact.
According to WorldatWork (2025), 42% of companies have revised their variable compensation models to adjust bonus sensitivity to financial results.
How to fix it:
Next, recalibrate the performance indicators. Make sure the goals are linked to measurable economic results and that there is a proportional weighting between corporate and departmental metrics.
Those who impact the results should feel the impact of the results.
The performance bonus has become too predictable
When the performance bonus pays the same amount every year, regardless of performance, it stops being a motivator.
This indicates that the model has lost its variable nature and has turned into a routine disguised as a bonus.
Research from the IDS Executive Compensation Review (2024) shows that overly predictable compensation plans can reduce engagement among high-performing teams by up to 25%.
How to fix it:
Therefore, reintroduce real variability. Set minimum, target, and stretch achievement levels, and create differentiated payouts based on performance.
As Edward P. Lazear reminds us, “a reward must have a clear gradient between effort and outcome; otherwise, it doesn’t influence behavior.”
Leadership doesn’t sponsor the program
If leaders don’t talk about the performance bonus, don’t celebrate results, and don’t explain goals, the program loses its legitimacy.
A variable compensation plan only works when leadership embodies the principles of meritocracy.
According to Aon’s 2024 Leadership in Rewards Survey, 64% of employees trust reward-related communication from their direct managers more than from any other corporate channel.
How to fix it:
Next, train and engage your leaders. Provide support materials, data, and result-driven storytelling so managers can act as communication ambassadors.
A well-sponsored performance bonus program is more effective than any internal campaign.
The performance bonus has become a topic only on payday
This may be the most dangerous sign. When the performance bonus only shows up on the paycheck, it’s a clear indication that performance management is disconnected from strategy. A strong program should stay alive throughout the year — guiding decisions and inspiring priorities.
Kevin J. Murphy, an expert in executive incentives, argues that “variable pay should be an ongoing dialogue, not an annual event.”
How to fix it:
Finally, create follow-up rituals. At the same time, monitor key indicators quarterly, communicate progress, and reinforce the program’s purpose in leadership forums. This way, the performance bonus stops being just an outcome and becomes a compass for performance.
Credibility is the most valuable asset of any performance bonus program
A performance bonus program loses credibility when it drifts away from its core principles: clarity, consistency, and fairness.
But when these pillars are restored, the program once again fulfills its purpose — aligning people, goals, and results.
As James F. Reda reminds us, “trust is the invisible currency of compensation.”
In a scenario where fixed salary increases tend to slow down, a solid and transparent variable compensation program can undoubtedly make the difference between teams that simply meet goals and those that truly deliver value.
Performance Bonus Maturity Matrix in Your Company
Now that you understand the reasons why your bonus plan may have lost engagement, assess your organization’s maturity level using the Performance Bonus Maturity Matrix. Find out which stage your organization is in!
| Level | Characteristic | Challenges |
| Manual | Spreadsheets, emails, and isolated calculations. | Errors, rework, low trust. |
| Automated | Digital tools, but not integrated with goals. | Lack of consistency between goals and results. |
| Integrated | KPIs and goals connected to corporate strategy. | Cultural resistance and lack of visibility. |
| Strategic | Performance management and performance bonus program as part of strategy execution. | None — stage of excellence. |
Finally, do you want real results from your performance bonus program? Talk to our team and find out how.
